The valuation date and report date answer different questions
The valuation date is the point in time the assessment relates to. The report date tells the reader when the work was issued. Mixing them can lead to a present-day trading position being used to answer a historical question.
Start by recording why the earlier date matters, what interest is being valued and who will use the work. A past shareholder change, a comparison of offers or an ownership disagreement may require different instructions. Where an agreement or legal process determines the date or basis, provide those instructions and involve the relevant adviser.
Build an evidence timeline before building the model
| Evidence | What to establish | Potential limitation |
|---|---|---|
| Accounts and monthly records | What trading had occurred by the date? | Later year-end adjustments may need reconciliation |
| Budgets and forecasts | Which version existed at the time? | A forecast created later may embed hindsight |
| Contracts and customer changes | What was signed, known or reasonably foreseeable? | Later outcomes may differ from expectations |
| Market comparisons | What conditions and evidence relate to the date? | Today’s multiples may be unsuitable |
| Ownership and financing | What rights, cash and obligations existed then? | Current balances can be materially different |
Keep original file dates, versions and explanations. A spreadsheet named “budget final” is less useful than a dated version tied to a board pack or contemporary correspondence.
Later information: separate clarification from hindsight
Later evidence can sometimes help explain a condition that already existed at the valuation date. It should not simply replace the expectations and uncertainties relevant at that time. The treatment needs to follow the valuation purpose and applicable instructions.
Illustrative scenario: a business loses a major customer in August, after a valuation date of 31 March. The relevant questions include whether notice had already been received, what contract terms applied and what management knew in March. It would be misleading either to ignore an existing notice or automatically assume the later loss was certain months earlier.
Document when each fact became available and explain its proposed use. An explicit information cut-off and a separate subsequent-events note help readers understand the reasoning.
What if records are incomplete?
Identify missing information before promising a level of precision. It may be possible to reconcile records from bank information, management packs and other contemporary evidence, but reconstructed figures need a clear audit trail and limitations.
We discuss whether the available information supports the proposed assignment, what additional work is needed and whether scenarios are more appropriate than a single conclusion. We do not present missing evidence as certainty or assume current trading is representative of the historical position.
A dated scenario: what belongs in a 31 March assessment?
Hypothetical evidence exercise. Imagine a company valued at 31 March, with a report written in October. The task is to distinguish records describing the March position from information that only emerged later. The treatment of each item must fit the agreed basis and instructions.
| Record | Timing | Question for the valuer |
|---|---|---|
| Board-approved sales forecast | 15 March | What assumptions and risks were recorded before the valuation date? |
| Notice from a major customer | 28 March | Was the effect reflected in information available at the date? |
| Year-end accounts completed | 30 June, covering the year to March | Do the later-prepared accounts clarify conditions already present? |
| A new contract signed | 20 May | What, if anything, was evidenced about this opportunity in March? |
| A new market shock | August | Is this a later development rather than a condition at the date? |
Attach the underlying correspondence or original version where available. Later accounts are not automatically unusable, and later success is not automatically evidence that success was certain in March. The explanation needs to distinguish the condition, when it became known and how the report uses it.
Reconstruct the forecast without rewriting history
Preserve the original forecast and build a separate reconciliation. For each major assumption, record its contemporary support, the uncertainty acknowledged at the time and any later information used only to clarify it. Do not silently replace an original budget with a more accurate hindsight version.
Consider a budget expecting 20 new customer contracts. If the pipeline at the date consisted of two signed contracts, six advanced discussions and twelve early prospects, those categories should remain visible. A later actual result of 18 wins does not itself establish the probability that should have been attached to the original pipeline.
Where no contemporary forecast exists, explain how any reconstructed expectations were developed and where judgement is unavoidable. The report should tell the reader which records are original and which calculations were prepared later. If the evidence cannot support the requested conclusion, discuss a narrower question or explicit limitations before spending further time on modelling.
How to brief a retrospective valuation enquiry
Provide the proposed valuation date, purpose, business and ownership interest, the reason the date was selected, the records available and any deadline. Do not upload confidential records through the initial form. We discuss a suitable information-sharing route once suitability and scope have been considered.
For current sale preparation, a historical report may need to be complemented by an assessment of today’s position. A past-date valuation is not automatically a current guide price.
Your next-step checklist
- Confirm the precise past valuation date.
- Retain original forecast versions and dated management records.
- Identify later events and when the underlying facts became known.
- Explain any legal, contractual or third-party requirements at the start.
Frequently asked questions
Can a business be valued at a date before the report is written?
Yes, subject to an appropriate purpose, instructions and sufficient historical evidence. The valuation date and the report date should be clearly distinguished.
Can current accounts be used for a historical valuation?
They may help reconcile records, but current results should not automatically replace information and expectations relevant at the past date. Their use and limitations need explanation.
Is a retrospective valuation suitable for a dispute?
Suitability depends on the appointment, legal instructions, evidence and required report. Tell us about the dispute before work begins so those requirements can be considered.
Does a later sale price establish the value at an earlier date?
Not automatically. The interval, changed trading, market conditions, deal terms and information relevant to the earlier date need consideration. A later transaction may provide evidence, but its relevance requires explanation.
What if the original forecast has been overwritten?
Look for dated board packs, lender submissions, archived files or correspondence that preserve the earlier version. Any reconstruction should be labelled and its evidence and limitations explained.
Professional context and further reading
This page provides general preparation guidance from Consult EFC. Its worked examples are original, hypothetical illustrations, not client outcomes, observed multiples or individual valuation advice.
- ICAEW: business and share valuation — assignment and methods
- IVSC: scope of International Valuation Standards
These resources provide background. Linking them does not imply that every engagement is IVS-compliant or endorsed by ICAEW or IVSC. Any professional assignment requires an agreed purpose, scope and intended use.
Put the question to a qualified adviser.
Tell us the decision, valuation purpose and any deadline. We will discuss suitability, information, scope and fees before work begins.
Discuss my valuation ↗